Showing posts with label Toronto Blue Jays. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Toronto Blue Jays. Show all posts

An untradeable player has been traded
















In each of the last two seasons I have included Vernon Wells in one of my How can they trade that untradeable contract? posts.

One for the blog after the 2009 season... one for The Hardball Times after the 2010 season.

Well, it took Adrian Beltre, Carl Crawford and just about every other player in creation to turn down the Angels to do it... but the Blue Jays found a suitor.

Vernon is heading to Los Angeles.
And then drive about an hour south and wind up in Anaheim. But let's for the sake of argument call it Los Angeles.

I personally think it is a terrific move for the Angels.
Wells is a stand up guy with talent. And he should fit in well with the organization and the lineup.

Please spare us all the indignity of breaking down his play and his WAR, VORP and OPS+. That's not what this move is about.

As I wrote before, this is about a change going to do him good.
He signed that gigantic contract to stay in Toronto. And it became his legacy and identity.

He even had to wear the hairshirt and indignity of having to admit he wasn't worth the contract.

It was time for a change of scenery. As much as he clearly loved Toronto, and as much as I thought him having a Todd Helton moment would have been super cool, he had to go.

I had him for two years in a row going to the Cubs. I thought the natural surface and a fresh start with a fan base would be ideal. But now he is off to a model organization with a good pitching staff, Kendry Morales should be back and no doubt Torii Hunter will welcome him with open arms.

He'll be playing for a potential Hall of Fame manager and will no doubt be in a pennant race.

And he won't have the constant reminder that his contract his too big.

Can you say "relaxed"? Can you "rejuvenated"? Can you say "big season for a guy who actually made the All Star team in 2010"?

Not bad for an untradeable player.




Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

A punch in the crotch... thank you very much

Lester on the mound...
Multiple home runs...
8th AND 9th inning heroics.

And in the end, the Red Sox might as well have been clobbered.

I hate losses like this. There were so many ways this game could have been won so naturally none of them come to fruition.

WHO THE HELL IS DAVID COOPER?

That's why I call these games teeth grinders.

And that's why I need to update the tally.



DODGED BULLET GAMES - 8

April 8 - 9-6 win against the Yankees. (The Sox end their 6 game losing streak with a slugfest. John Lackey stinks but Phil Hughes stinks even more.)
April 10 - 4-0 win against the Yankees. (Beckett and Sabathia duel in a game that was 1-0 until the late innings.)
April 20 - 5-3 win in Oakland. (Red Sox survive a lead off homer and two bases loaded situations and facing the tying run at the plate to win their first road game.)
April 21 - 4-2 win in Anaheim. (The Red Sox stranded 15 men on base and Josh Beckett's went 8 strong with no decision. But the Sox rallied in the 11th to win.)
April 22 - 4-3 win in Anaheim. (Peter Bourjos makes a 2 run errors and the Red Sox survive a bizarre passed ball by Jarrod Saltalamacchia that let a run scored from second.)
May 1 - 3-2 win against the Mariners. (Ichiro loses a ball in the sun that turns into a 9th inning triple for Lowrie. Crawford singles him home for the win.)
May 8 - 9-5 win against the Twins. (Dice-K lets up 3 runs in the first but settles down as the Red Sox clobber Carl Pavano.)
May 9 - 2-1 win against the Twins. (A bullpen breakdown cost Beckett the decision but Cark Crawford ended the game with an 11th inning walk off hit.)


TEETH GRINDER GAMES - 12

April 1 - 9-5 loss in Texas. (The Sox tie Opening Day in the 8th with an Ortiz homer only to have Bard implode and the Sox let up 4 in the bottom of the 8th.)
April 5 - 3-1 loss in Cleveland. (The Sox drop their 4th straight as the bats are dead in Cleveland.)
April 7 - 1-0 loss in Cleveland. (Sox blow a great Lester performance on a squeeze bunt and Darnell McDonald overrunning the bag to end the game.)
April 12 - 3-2 loss to Tampa Bay. (A solid Lester performance is wasted as Kyle Farnsworth of all people shuts down the Sox.)
April 15 - 7-6 loss to Toronto. (Bobby Jenks implodes with a 4 run seventh inning as the Red Sox waste Pedroia and Youkilis homers and a clutch RBI double by Scuatro.
April 19 - 5-0 loss in Oakland. (Pedroia gets picke doff, the Sox bats go dead and waste a solid Lackey start.)
April 26 - 4-1 loss in Baltimore. (Buchholz pitches tentatively and the Sox let Kevin Gregg of all people to close out the 9th.)
April 27 - 5-4 loss in Baltimore. (The Sox tie the game with a 3 run 8th only to have Bard lose it in the bottom of the 8th.)
April 29 - 5-4 loss to Mariners. (Bobby Jenks blows a 7th inning lead, wasting 2 Mike Cameron homers.)
April 30 - 2-0 loss to Mariners. (The Sox strand 11 runnerss and let Milton Bradley double home the go ahead run.)
May 4 - 5-3 loss to Angels. (7 hours with rain delays and stranded runners. Marco Scutaro was thrown out at the plate in the 12th)
May 10 - 7-6 loss in Toronto. (8th and 9th inning heroics, including a homer by Adrian Gonzalez, are undone by a walk off sacrifice fly by David Cooper.)

Back down to -4.
Will this team EVER get to .500??



Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

The Bill Mazeroski Baseball Annual for 1987 - A treasure found at my parents house


Whenever I go back to my parents home, which was also my home during my high school days, I love going through the closets and seeing what artifact from my childhood I can unearth.

This past Christmas I stumbled across this gem: Bill Mazeroski's Baseball Annual for 1987.

For those of you who don't remember or are too young to even know, the release of the Bill Mazeroski Annual was one of the highlights off the off season. It had all of the stats, all of the predictions, all of the analysis of off season moves and breakdowns of prospects.

Now I am not sure how much of the book was actually the responsibility of the Hall of Fame second baseman. He was credited as "Associate Editor." I imagine he endorsed it and gave it some baseball credibility the same way Alfred Hitchcock gave his name to the Three Investigator series. (God bless you if you understood THAT reference!)

The 1987 edition was personally very important for me. It was the preview that took place right after the 1986 World Series and helped heal those wounds. But that was also the year my family was getting ready to move from Massachusetts to California and I needed to read up on the National League and the West coast teams. This book got worn out!

Let's take a closer look at this pre-internet artifact.

THE COVER

I know the covers were different from region to region. The Boston one had the brutal reminder of what had just happened the previous October.

And it wasn't a picture of Bill Buckner or maybe Wade Boggs crying. It was Dwight Evans... the longest tenured Red Sox... looking pissed.

Brutal and cruel.




THE T.Q. SYSTEM

The Mazeroski Annual used a team evaluation system called Total Quotient (or T.Q.) system that looked damn impressive to a 14 year old Sully.

They broke down the team piece by piece with a rating system, combined those pieces and were able to see which teams were the strongest and which teams were hopeless.

It took the guessing out of picking a team and made it scientific.

Here's the problem. They didn't predict a single Division Winner correctly.

The NL East Champion Cardinals and NL West Champion Giants were picked third. The AL East Champion Tigers were picked second and the eventual World Champion Twins were picked second to last. So much for T.Q.s.



THE IN DEPTH SEASON PREVIEWS

I can't stress enough what a gold mine this was for a baseball starved fan making it through the winter.

In the days before the internet, THIS was our Baseball-Reference.com. Imagine everything you would ever look up on the internet squashed together into one gigantic search. That was the Bill Mazeroski Annual.

Often times I wouldn't remember how a player did in the season or which farm system had the most future stars or what each teams holes are. Today you go to Google.

Then?
You went to Bill Mazeroski.

On this page, the outrageously talented Blue Jays team was dissected, injected, inspected, detected, infected, neglected and selected more intensely than Arlo Guthrie in Alice's Restaurant.


THE 1987 MINNESOTA TWINS PREVIEW

Nobody, and I mean nobody, picked the Twins to win the 1987 World Series.

The T.Q. system didn't have the Twins ranked highly and their season's preview is quite sarcastic.

They make a few "Prarie Dome Companion" jokes and wonder what happened to a team that had so much promise that the beginning of the decade.

At one point in the preview, the writer talks about how young manager Tom Kelly might be in over his head and "he'll probably have to show quick progress to keep from being the fifth Twin manager fired this decade."

I would venture to guess that winning the World Series qualifies as quick progress.

He would manage the Twins from 1986 to 2001, also managing the 1991 World Series winner and the 2001 team that signaled the rebound of the franchise.

Not bad for a manager that Twins owner Carl Pohlad "isn't exactly wild about."


THE FUTURE STARS

Of the many sections of the Mazeroski guide, the Future Stars was one that got me giddy for the next season.

This was the John the Baptist "Prepare ye the way" moment of the Hot Stove months. After breaking down what teams need and what their holes are, the Future Stars give me a nice healthy guide of can't miss players who will dominate the next season.

Guys like Mike Grant and Mickey Brantley.

And Cubs prospect Rafael Palmeiro is described as a good hitter without home run power. Interesting that he found a home run swing after joining Jose Canseco in Texas.


THE FARM REPORT

The Future Stars section may have been exciting, but the Farm Report would get worn out over the course of the year.

Whenever a player got recalled from the minor leagues, I would see if the Mazeroski guide included him in their amazingly in depth look at each farm system's top players.

They also listed each team's farm clubs. Milwaukee's AAA team was in Denver. The Rockies debut wasn't until 1993.

I trusted the guide without question. If they told me that the Milwaukee Brewers had a Grade A quality farm system, then I believed it.

And if they listed a prospect, I just assumed they would be a solid major leaguer.

The Brewers highly rated farm produced from this crop Gary Sheffield, Chris Bosio, B. J. Surhoff and Darryl Hamilton.

They also highly rated Edgar Diaz, Mike Birkbeck, Vincente Palacios, Dan Murphy and Mark Ambrose. So it wasn't an exact science.







THE BRAVES FARM REPORT


Take a close look at the Braves farm system report.

It is super snarky, basically saying that the cupboard is bare after some ill advised free agent signings. The Farm System gets a C- report and it is safe to say after reading their analysis that their minor leagues needed an overhaul.

But look at some of the players listed in the report as long range prospects:

Jeff Blauser, who became a staple on many Braves teams including the 1995 World Champions.

Tom Glavine, the future Hall of Famer and multiple Cy Young winner who would go on to capture the 1995 World Series MVP.

David Justice (then called Dave) who became the offensive star of those teams and whose homer put the Braves up for good in the 1995 World Series.

The “Keep Your Eye On” section included Kent Mercker, another contributor to the 1995 World Championship and who threw a no hitter in 1994. Ron Gant became a key slugger for the 1991 and 1992 National League Champions and Pete Smith played on the 1992 NL pennant winners.

Not a bad haul for a C- farm system.


THE COLLEGE REPORT

As I said before, I got this particular issue when my family moved from New England to California. And I found myself in Palo Alto just as the Stanford Cardinal was a College World Series winner, exposing me to quality college baseball for the first time in my life.

So naturally as a frequent spectator at Sunken Diamond, I felt like checking up on the big college stars was the next cool thing to do.

They pictured Jack McDowell, whom I saw pitch at Stanford and was indeed a bad ass. They also listed Georgia’s Cris Carpenter who eventually went to the Cardinals.

That isn’t a typo. He didn’t spell it with an “h”.
The Chris Carpenter who spelled it correctly won a Cy Young Award with the Cardinals.




A GOOD CASE FOR A FRANCHISE IN PHOENIX

The college section included this little blurb that argued for Phoenix being a logical place to put a big league franchise. The crux of their argument was the number of terrific college players that came through Arizona.

That’s true, but by that logic, should there have been a team in San Pedro de Macoris in the Dominican Republic. Back then putting teams in Arizona and Florida seemed so logical. Yet in reality they play to too many empty seats!




A GUIDE TO SCOUTING


How long ago was 1987? Back then scouts were actually respected!

A whole section was devoted to "Time-Honored Tenets" and evaluating talent by watching players and coming up with a personal opinion.

Reading this section almost felt like looking at a map of the world before Columbus set sail.

You can hear the Sabermetrics people rolling their eyes when you glance at it.


HI TECH BASEBALL

Watch this ad for Intellivision. That used to be the super high tech videogame system. At the time it blew our minds.

Now?
It looks kind of lame, right? That mind bogglingly cool baseball game from the late 1970s would be a crappy app on your phone.

That is what this article about hi tech baseball read like now.

Wow! Managers are using computers to keep track of scouting reports? They include information like batting averages and match ups? That's AMAZING!

I bet those computers held up to 10 pages worth of information!

If you punched in WAR or VORP or OPS+ into that computer, it would crash.

10 - Go to batting Average.
20 - Go to gut instinct.
30 - RUN.


As awesome as it was going through the old articles, it was almost more interesting to check out the classic ads.

THE 1987 EDITION OF STRAT O MATIC

For those of you too young to remember, before everyone was doing Fantasy Baseball, Strat o Matic was the best way to simulate a baseball game.

You had stats!
You had strategy!

It was like playing Fantasy Baseball... except it took hours and hours and hours.

We had more time back then.

I am tempted to call the toll free number and mail in the form from the bottom of this ad.

I assume they are still accepting orders.






MANNY'S BASEBALL LAND

This one also has an order form. I might have to start dropping these in the mail to see what happens.

This ad was for the souvenir store that was one time located next to Yankee Stadium. In fact it says right there in the ad "Formerly opposite Yankee Stadium."

Remember in the 1980s the Bronx sucked.
I mean REALLY sucked.

I am saying that compared to the 1980s, the current Bronx is Monte Carlo.

So maybe that is why Manny's left for New Jersey.

For those of you who can't understand how we could have bought things like caps, jersey's and jackets through the mail without even seeing what the product looked like, rest assured, I don't remember how we did it either.




THE PACIFIC TRADING CARD, INC AD

There was a time before ebay and Amazon that THIS was how you bought things like baseball cards.

This particular page is a slice of 1980s Sully nerd heaven.

Not only is it covered with offers for entire sets of baseball cards, but on the lower right hand corner: Star Wars cards!

Throw in some Batman comics and we'll be complete!










Those ads we fun and kind of wholesome (although the trading card world certainly had their share of unsavory people.)

But there were some other ads that made me scratch my head to "who exactly were they selling this magazine to?"


KOOL MILDS CIGARETTES

Yup. Cigarette ads.

I guess this magazine wasn't designed with kids in mind, but man smoking looked appealing for THIS 14 year old reading the magazine.

I'll look like that guy and get the blonde to hang out with me?

Light them up!

It was different back then. I remember in a little league tournament I played in 1981 there was a giant Marlboro banner along the first base line.

I was nine then. No harm in making a nine year old think smoking is cool.





SEAGRAM'S GIN

Speaking of looking cool... 14 year old Sully stopped at this ad. A lot!

I got the message loud and clear:
Drink Seagram's Gin and a woman that outrageously sexy will want you.

It is 2011 and this ad is still pretty hot.

Needless to say there were a lot of strange messages being sent to a kid going through puberty reading this magazine.

Then again, the mantra "just think about baseball" wasn't that hard to carry out.







THE ESCORT RADAR WARNING RECEIVER

A Fuzz Buster!

A device that let's detect where police cars are so you can BREAK THE LAW BY SPEEDING!

Are these even legal anymore?

Who exactly was this magazine being marketed towards?

A bunch of gin drinking, chain smoking memorbilia collectors driving too fast trying to avoid the cops?

Them, and your friend Sully.


I wonder whatever time capsules exist in my old closet....










Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

Kevin Gregg and the battle between stats and your own eyes

I know it seems like I have it in for Kevin Gregg. I wrote about him torpedoing the 2008 Marlins playoff hopes.

In 2009 I couldn't figure out why the Cubs would want him.

In 2010 I wrote about how he shouldn't be the closer for the Blue Jays.

And last month I kind of freaked out when I saw the Red Sox were interested in him.

Now he has 2 years in Baltimore, and he supplied some relief... for ME! As a Red Sox fan, I didn't want him in Fenway. Now I know he is going to stay in the AL East, which is great for any AL East team NOT named Baltimore.

Look, I never met Kevin Gregg. I am sure he is a nice guy. I am sure he has talent. But I feel like I am Bizarro World when I hear people say things like "Gregg has a track record that suggests he will be a fairly dependable closer."

REALLY?
I guess if by dependable you mean "you can depend on him to blow some big games."

But this got me thinking. There seems to be two very different schools of thought in baseball today when it comes to evaluating players:

There is the old school of scouting, watching the players and going with gut instinct.
And there is the statistical evaluation with an ever evolving series of numerical criteria.

The problem with the first school is of course it is totally subjective. You could see someone have a great game the first time you saw them play and skew any scouting report to that opening impression. Plus there is no way to quantify things like "heart" and "clutch" and "gets his uniform dirty." Yeah someone could get a clutch hit... but what if they got it off of a lousy pitcher?

Stat heads often have little patience for any praise or criticism for a player not based on numbers. I am sure someone out there can tell me why, statistically, Kirk Gibson's home run off of Dennis Eckersley was not impressive.

But of course there is a reason why they cling to stats: They are not subjective. It is a game of numbers. Your worth comes from the numbers, not some vague intangible. "Moxy" doesn't win ball games. A good on base percentage plus slugging can.

There are problems with the stats approach as well. While focusing only on stats and eliminating any human emotion might be a great way to assemble a fantasy team, the players are actually human. And sometimes there are elements to someone's game that have nothing to do with the WAR that can make a player a bad fit.

All the statistical analysis showed that Edgar Renteria was a terrific fit for the Red Sox. Anyone who knew the guy felt that the rough Northeastern media environment would not gel with the shortstop. The Red Sox signed him and BANG! he didn't fit in and had one of his worst seasons.

Last year when Javy Vazquez was reacquired by the Yankees, the stat heads were saying they had an ace and a bulldog. Look at his strikeout per inning ratio! Look at how many innings he pitched! Look at his situation wins saved! But I said and many other people said "Didn't he flop in New York? Didn't he fold up like a tent? And why would Ozzie Guillen trash Vazquez's ability during a pennant run?" The statistical analysis won out, and to the surprise of nobody and except people analyzing the stats, he was a disaster in New York.

This brings us back to Gregg.
You can look at his strikeout totals, his good strikeout to walk ratio, his high save total and any other means you want to fold his stats into an oragami swan.

The most disturbing trend in his career when you look at the stats has nothing to do with numbers. It has to do with the teams.

The Orioles will be his fifth team in the last six seasons. Isn't that a red flag? Doesn't that tell you that each of these teams kicked the tires and drove the car and said "In theory it is great... but you can have it."

All games, saves and blown saves are created equal on the back of the baseball card but not in reality. The games he blew down the stretch for the Marlins were huge stretch run games that took wind out of their sails in the Wild Card hunt. The games he blew out of the gate for the Cubs helped them stumble into the 2009 season and they never recovered.

Each of those teams had him and didn't seem to have any urgency to keep him.
That's a red flag folks.

Not convinced?
Still think that you analyze the stats and that is the end all and be all of figuring out who to sign?

How about this compromise?
You look at the stats, but then before offering a contract, you poll the fans. You know, the people who actually LIVED with the player for a season.

Remember Armando Benitez?

If you looked at his stats, you would come to the conclusion that he was an elite reliever. His strikeout to innings pitched ratio was insane. His ERA was solid. He piled up saves.

He won the Rolaids Relief Award in 2001.

Ask Mets fans about that great season he had in 2001. He was so hated by Met fans that year for his critical blown saves down the stretch that you would have thought he had wiped his butt with the flag flown at Ground Zero.

And this was AFTER he blew key post season saves in the 1999 Division Series, 1999 NLCS, 2000 Division Series and 2000 World Series.

I lived in New York when he pitched for the Mets. I lived near San Francisco when he pitched for the Giants. Don't talk to me about his stats. He was a disaster in both places.

How his agent kept getting him big contracts was a topic of an early Sully Baseball post.

Oriole fans who now have Kevin Gregg to deal with also remember Benitez and him blowing games in the 1996 and 1997 post season.

Yeah he had great numbers. But sometimes the numbers didn't add up.

Kevin Gregg, like Benitez and Vazquez, keeps getting passed around to teams who think they are getting a stud while their former team is chuckling.

So am I saying to throw stats in the garbage?
Of course not. Relying too much on scouting and subjective opinion is nuts. And relying only on numbers is perilous. Like a good pitcher, you need a combination of the two. Look at the numbers, understand the circumstances that the stats were piled up in.

And if the people who actually watch the player flinch when you mention him... maybe take a pass.



Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

10 thoughts about the 2011 Hall of Fame vote



Bert Blyleven and Roberto Alomar are Hall of Famers. The election results are in and this wonderful day on the baseball calendar will no doubt have the columnists and bloggers typing all night long.

So why not chime in my own self?

I predicted than only Blyleven and Alomar would get in despite many other worthy candidates. But I have some other thoughts on these matters.


1. ALOMAR SHOULD BECOME THE FIRST HALL OF FAMER WITH A BLUE JAYS HAT ON THE PLAQUE

Only Rickey Henderson, Phil Niekro, Paul Molitor and Dave Winfield even played in Toronto and got elected to Cooperstown. (And Molitor was the only one to stay for more than a year.)

Alomar was a Blue Jay for five seasons. Not exactly a lifer with any one team, he should have the sideways bird engraved for all time. (The Blue Jay... NOT the Oriole).



2. BLYLEVEN SCORES ONE FOR "THE FAM-A-LEE"

An interesting thing happens when a player plays as long as Bert Blyleven did and has to wait almost as long to get elected. You find yourself celebrating teams that played generations ago.

Bert Blyleven wasn't the biggest star on the 1979 Pirates (the late Willie Stargell was) but he now joins Pops in the Hall of Fame. And while Bert will probably go in as a Minnesota Twin, his time in Pittsburgh (where he threw the complete game win to clinch the NLCS and came out of the bullpen to win Game 5 of the World Series) should be saluted.

I have a mild obsession with the 1979 Pirates and hope that SOMEONE will cue up the Sister Sledge this summer in Cooperstown.



3. ALAS FELLOW "FAM-A-LEE" MEMBER DAVE PARKER WON'T BE JOINING HIM

On the 1979 Pirates, Dave Parker was a much more imposing figure than Blyleven. And I supported the Cobra's Hall of Fame candidacy. But after 15 attempts it didn't happen.

Maybe the Veterans Committee will take another look at him. Short of that, being the bad ass 1978 National League MVP and having two World Series rings might have to suffice.



4. HOW MANY PEOPLE WHO LEFT THEIR BALLOTS BLANK LAST YEAR VOTED FOR ALOMAR AND BLYLEVEN THIS YEAR?

Last year five writers left their ballots blank. And last year Blyleven and Alomar missed being elected by just a few votes. Those blank ballots could have been the difference.

If you left them blank last year and voted for Robbie and Bert this year, you should have your voting rights taken away.

Also if there were no Alomar nor Blyleven on the ballot, would there have been more support for Barry Larkin or other returning players? We'll never know.



5. GET TO WORK ON YOUR SPEECH, BARRY LARKIN

It is going to happen. People like Barry Larkin. There is no cloud of doubt hanging over Barry Larkin. AND he got 62.1% of the vote this year.

Next year the player with the best Hall of Fame resume being put on the ballot if Bernie Williams. Terrific player. Not a Hall of Famer. He'll get the votes next year to get in.






6. IT LOOKS LIKE THE 1984 TIGERS WON'T HAVE A HALL OF FAMER ON THEIR ROSTER

Sparky Anderson's passing recently shone attention back onto his wonderful 1984 World Champion Tiger team. It certainly FELT like a star studded super star team back then. But Kirk Gibson and Lance Parrish never got the Hall of Fame support and now it looks more and more like Jack Morris and Alan Trammell's vote tallies are not going to cut it.

Therefore the only Hall of Famer from the 1984 Tigers would be Sparky.



7. IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD FOR MANY STARS OF THE 1980s

Don Mattingly's support is stagnant. Dale Murphy's isn't getting better. Lee Smith can't get over the hump after nine attempts. And poor Harold Baines is off the ballot after 5 tries. If Baines ONLY got those extra seven hits a year.

The 80s, the decade I grew up on, is struggling to put its superstars in the Hall!


8. WHY NO LOVE FOR TIM RAINES?

Staying with 1980s stars not getting love from the voters, the most perplexing is the lack of support for Tim Raines. In his fourth attempt he got less than 40% of the vote. It can't be just because he played in Montreal.

It can't be because of his drug problems.

I think people haven't looked at his stats. Well here they are. Read them and vote! (Jim Rice had less than 40% of the vote too at one point and he got in, so there is hope.)




9. UM... MARQUIS GRISSOM GOT 4 VOTES?

As I wrote in my Jay Bell - Hall of Famer post a few years ago, I get it when a guy gets a stray vote. A sports writer may want to throw a bone to a player they liked and make sure they didn't come and go without a single vote. It's when a player gets more than one sympathy vote that I start to wonder "Did I see the wrong player?"

I've got nothing against Marquis Grissom... a good solid baseball lifer. But FOUR voters used their ballot to say "He should be immortalized!" Imagine if 460 did. They'd be carving a plaque for him. As for B.J. Surhoff... this article kind of says it all.



10. THE NEXT 15 SOME ODD YEARS ARE NOT GOING TO FUN IN TERMS OF HALL OF FAME VOTING


Kevin Brown is mercifully off the ballot... but Juan Gonzalez somehow will stick around for next year. And Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmeiro can't bust 20% of the vote but will be debated next winter as well.

The 'roids talk influenced the Jeff Bagwell vote and it isn't going to get prettier as the dreaded 2013 election looms... and Bonds and Clemens are eligible.

Be prepared for years and years of the tainted names on the ballot and lots of debate. Which is GREAT news for candidates like Barry Larkin and Rock Raines who will get more support from writers who don't want to send in blank ballots.




Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

Some seats are too good














John Farrell is having a hard enough time watching his Blue Jays fall behind 2-0 in the first inning.

Does he REALLY have to be so close to the Yahoo in the Bruins jersey and old school Red Sox hat?

I mean he can lean right over and say "If you pitch to Papi without a shift you ahhhh totally re-tah-ded."

"Thanks for the tip."

Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

The reawakening of Vernon Wells - My latest for The Hardball Times



In my latest for The Hardball Times, I speculate about Vernon Wells and the potentially joyful season he might be having for the Angels. My reasons are not based on stats but rather emotions, which means the commenters will probably hate my guts.

Ahh well.

You can read the whole article here.



Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

Tom Henke was not a Hall of Famer… but he could have been - My Latest for The Hardball Times



In my latest for The Hardball Times, I wrote about the Toronto reliever known as The Terminator.

Tom Henke was the top reliever in the National League in 1995 and then retired. If he stuck around and piled up some stats, we might be talking about him for the Hall of Fame.

Read the whole article here.




Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

NO! Red Sox... do NOT sign Kevin Gregg!!!!







Ken Rosenthal is pretty good at his job... but PLEASE be wrong with this Tweet!
Seriously Red Sox... why bring him in? For MULTI YEARS?

You want multiyears?
How about 2008 when he all but sabotaged the Marlins playoff run? I wrote about that when I trashed the Cubs for signing him.

He was awful with the Cubs in 2009. I wrote about that when I trashed the Blue Jays for signing him.

He was mediocre with the Blue Jays in 2010. I wrote about that when I trashed him last year.

Don't do it, Red Sox! Let some other team be a chump and bring him aboard. There is NO NEED for this. He will make Eric Gagne look like Mariano Rivera.

Let the Pirates, Nationals, Orioles or Mariners get in the mix.

For EVERYONE'S sake.

(Oh Lord make this not happen.)


Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

It is feeling a lot like 1992 around here
























A franchise that had been a post season monster was on the verge of losing the ALCS 4-1 in their home park.

A franchise that had never ever won a post season series had stunned the biggest and baddest team in baseball to take a 3-1 lead in the ALCS.

The proud recent champion sent their stud ace to the mound... and he held serve. The big bad recent champs won Game 5 convincingly and sent the series back to the road.

Which series am I talking about?
The 2010 ALCS?
The 1992 ALCS?

That year the A's, who seemed ready to reclaim the World Series run they went on from 1988 to 1990 faced off against the Toronto Blue Jays, who were always talented but couldn't get out of their own way in the post season.

When the A's, behind a 9th inning homer by Harold Baines took the opener in Toronto it looked like business as usual. But the Blue Jays won Game 2 in SkyDome and Game 3 in Oakland. And shockingly, Dennis Eckersley let up a 9th inning game tying homer to Robby Alomar and the Jays took a 3-1 lead with the extra inning win.

The A's were stunned that their October march was going to come crashing so soon.

So they handed the ball to Dave Stewart, the biggest bad ass in the post season (yes, even more than Jack Morris.)

Stewart went the distance, getting the 6-2 complete game win and saying to the Jays "Not on MY watch!"

How did the Jays do after that in Game 6? They pounded Mike Moore and won the game 9-2... winning the first ever pennant for Toronto.

Does that bode well for the Rangers coming home to Arlington?

Well we DO know that they have a rested and ready ace for Game 7... if it goes that far.

And you KNOW he'll say not on MY watch.




Follow sullybaseball on Twitter

Girardi and Vazquez talk on the mound














At one point during a typical Javier Vazquez start (less then 5 innings, more than 5 runs) he got hit by a line from Blue Jays' John Buck.

Joe Girardi and the training staff came running out to talk to him.

GIRARDI: Javy! Are you alright?

VAZQUEZ: I'm fine skip. Let's play ball.

GIRARDI: Man this looks bad. You could have been killed.

VAZQUEZ: What are you talking about? I picked it up, I threw the guy out at second.

GIRARDI: No. I think there's some real damage here. Can you even move your arm?

VAZQUEZ: What the hell? I'm fine. I'm ready to keep pitching.

(Girardi grinds his teeth as he talks to Vazquez real close face to face.)

GIRARDI: It would be a SHAME if this line drive took you not only out of the game but maybe even ends your season.

VAZQUEZ: Ends my season? I'm making my bid for a post season start.

(Girardi fumes.)

GIRARDI: Gee Javy... how AWFUL would it be for me to not include you on the playoff roster because of an INJURY. But I guess you would be looked at as a warrior who gave his body for the team as opposed to a bust of a starting pitcher whose ERA starts with a f*cking 5!!!

VAZQUEZ: (Standing his ground.) I'm fine.

GIRARDI: You know you being injured... it would be a shame but it would be a no brainer for me to have a healthy pitcher on the team and no loss of honor for you. Don't you agree Javy?

(The Umpire breaks it up.)

UMP: Hey, is he ready to pitch?


VAZQUEZ: You bet I am... and you'll see. Not only am I healthy but you are going to know EXACTLY where I fit on this playoff roster.

(Girardi glares at him and walks back to the dugout. Vazquez pitches to the next batter...)

(An inning later Vazquez lets up a 3 run homer to put the Yankees in a 7-0 hole. He finishes the game and probably his Yankee career with 4 2/3 innings, 7 runs, 10 hits, 2 walks and 0 strikeouts. His record is 10-10 and his ERA is 5.32.)

(Girardi takes him out.)

GIRARDI: You just COULDN'T play hurt, could you?

VAZQUEZ: (Shoulders slumped.) Does this affect my post season chances?

GIRARDI: Don't worry. I am sure we can get you tickets to the games.



Follow sullybaseball on Twitter